I saw a mouse in the street here night (I saw a mouse in the street last night). Here, seen does not conform to the subject of the sentence and remains seen, regardless of the sex of the speaker. This rule of compliance with previous entries with having is quite difficult, but it is important to know to be fully grammatically correct (especially when writing, because most of the time you will hear no difference if spoken!). Let me comment below with any questions or examples where you would use the previous participatory agreement. In these cases, the reflexive pronoun is not the direct object. In the first sentence, the farts are prepared; In the second case, the thing that is broken is the leg. And in these cases, there is no agreement on the past. We found that native speakers in the common language do not tend to enter into participatory agreements with having if they are the norm in formal writings. The same goes for reflexive verbs. Thus, z.B.
the formal written form of this sentence has a convention of participation passed with the direct object: 2. Where is the direct object? Before the verb Have, there is an agreement. “Les” is for “fries,” which is the female plural. You need to know two things so that participants who have followed the past can agree correctly: 1. To answer the question: What? to find out what`s going on. 2. To answer the question: where? to find the direct object of the sentence (before the verb have). For example, if you want to say, “I left at 9 o`clock,” you would say, “I left at 9:00.
” If you add the last “e,” it depends on whether the speaking person is male or female. But previous entries, which follow the verb “tre,” must be consistent with the pronoun. So if you`re talking about a group of people, you should make the past participatory; for example, “We went to get ice,” is written in French: “We went to get ice.” The rule is: if the direct object is written according to the verb “have”: no correspondence! So we write “eaten” (no s at the end) Normally we learn that previous entries that use the verb have do not need to be consistent.